Sorry Bob Rohner (not Bob Papp)... And he had another model -- not the model he used for the demo. He said he'd fire the demo model up with the coil removed if I wanted but I didn't bother taking him up on it.
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Did Bob Papp remove the coil for the demo? Did you see the poper work with > the coil installed; any differences? Was the pisten movement strong? What > was the cylinder made of? Other details? > > Axil > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:46 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Bob Papp told me, last Friday, that the coil is not only not necessary, >> but doesn't significantly assist the function. He repeatedly fired off a >> cylinder without the coil as a demonstration. >> >> Part of my motivation to visit was to make sure that the (non-heat >> engine) mechanical force was not simply a plasma pinch driven by the coil. >> Obviously, it wasn't. >> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The question: >>> Why is the axial confinement coil required in the papp engine. The Papp >>> reaction will not work without the coil. >>> The answer: >>> When the plasma is formed, the coil confines plasma into a very thin >>> conductive channel where one dimensional electron flow along the channel >>> makes the current superconductive. A electron screening cloud forms >>> together with Rydberg matter in the partial plasma. This causes aneutronic >>> fusion of three helium atoms into Boron11 and a proton. >>> >>> This is consistent with the finding of a brown ash in the Papp engine as >>> a nuclear ash. >>> >>> Cheers: Axil >>> >> >> >
