According to this paper, clusters of atoms drop the coulomb barrier. The paper you reference in thiis post sites this as a cause of coulomb barrier lowering. Cheers: Axil
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Features-and-Giant-Acceleration.pdf On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com> wrote: > I read it too. The work has also been published in an influential > peer-reviewed journal, JETP (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical > Physics), a leading Russian journal also published in English: > > http://www.springerlink.com/content/rup025083t105q83/ > > It is hard to know what to make of this. It says the Coulomb barrier drops > away to low levels under conditions we can in principle control. If true, > that would be ... big. > > Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts for > variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI > background in the vicinity of the experiment? > > Jeff > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > >> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz" <pdx...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM >> > Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device >> > If you open this link: >> > >> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf >> > >> > >> > It turns out that the PDF contains three separate and unrelated LENR >> > papers stuck together end to end. >> >> The third paper is worth reading ... Harmonic oscillator explains the >> peaks in Hagelstein/Letts/Craven laser beat frequencies. >> >> Ni+p => Cu+v reaction rate goes from 10^-1000 to 10^-4 >> >> Says it explains Rossi-Focardi ... except that they don't use a RF >> stimulator (any more?) >> >> >
