Let's assume these "Super Atoms" or "Super Atom Clusters" obey the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle" as do other particles. On one hand they can reward you with redshifted lower energy radiation usable as heat but on the other hand they consume and destroy all matter within their gravitational reach. They bust up coloumb barriers due to the extremely high frequencies they can generate through blueshifting near their center. They magnify uncertainty within their surroundings much more than typical particles due to their size or quantities. They can also collapse into each other creating "Super Duper Atoms"...
On Monday, August 20, 2012, ChemE Stewart wrote: > "Super Atom or ultra dense atomic clusters": It can be expected that any > radiation escaping this super atom will be reshifted to lower frequencies > and energy levels and that any particles approaching this super atom will > be blueshifted to extremely high frequencies and energy levels. Very > disruptive to ANYTHING in nature > > On Monday, August 20, 2012, Axil Axil wrote: > >> The super-atom produced as a large collection of coherent and entangled >> particles can completely lowers the Coulomb barrier. This is how atomic >> clustering fits into the LENR+ process. >> >> see >> >> *www.iscmns.org/work10/VysotskiiVapplicatio.ppt* >> ** >> ** >> *Cheers: Axil* >> >> ** >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> According to this paper, clusters of atoms drop the coulomb barrier. The >>> paper you reference in thiis post sites this as a cause of coulomb >>> barrier lowering. >>> Cheers: Axil >>> >>> >>> >>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Features-and-Giant-Acceleration.pdf >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I read it too. The work has also been published in an influential >>>> peer-reviewed journal, JETP (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical >>>> Physics), a leading Russian journal also published in English: >>>> >>>> http://www.springerlink.com/content/rup025083t105q83/ >>>> >>>> It is hard to know what to make of this. It says the Coulomb barrier >>>> drops away to low levels under conditions we can in principle control. If >>>> true, that would be ... big. >>>> >>>> Wouldn't it be amusing if the "uncontrolled variable" that accounts for >>>> variation of results over the last 23 years turned out to be the RFI >>>> background in the vicinity of the experiment? >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> > From: "Jeff Berkowitz" <pdx...@gmail.com> >>>>> > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:08:15 PM >>>>> > Subject: [Vo]:Analysis of W-L theory as applicable to Rossi device >>>>> > If you open this link: >>>>> > >>>>> http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Vysotskii-Stimulated-LENR-Paper.pdf >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > It turns out that the PDF contains three separate and unrelated LENR >>>>> > papers stuck together end to end. >>>>> >>>>> The third paper is worth reading ... Harmonic oscillator explains the >>>>> peaks in Hagelstein/Letts/Craven laser beat frequencies. >>>>> >>>>> Ni+p => Cu+v reaction rate goes from 10^-1000 to 10^-4 >>>>> >>>>> Says it explains Rossi-Focardi ... except that they don't use a RF >>>>> stimulator (any more?) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
