I am looking this paper with very mixed feelinga. Admiration for a great effort, however 5% success rate due to palladiumphilia can be described by two nasty Latin sayings- too:
Errare humanum est, persverare diabolicum Parturiunt montes, nascetur ridiculus mus I am very sorry but Pd is not good despite...everything.. Don't make the skeptics happy! Peter On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Akira Shirakawa <shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com > wrote: > On 2012-08-20 20:46, Jed Rothwell wrote: > > *Anomalous Results in Fleischmann-Pons Type Electrochemical* >> > [...] > > This should be the result of what was mentioned in the 2012 DARPA budget > review: > > http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/**07/darpa-nanotech-projects-** > nanoscale.html<http://nextbigfuture.com/2012/07/darpa-nanotech-projects-nanoscale.html> > http://www.mail-archive.com/**vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg67364.**html<http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg67364.html> > > Cheers, > S.A. > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
