I went with a non-snarky fairly neutral "wait and see" response:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_Catalyzer_(2nd_nomination)#Energy_Catalyzer

Keep Although the eCat has not achieved mainstream media attention, there is sufficient Non-WP:RS evidence that things are happening behind the scenes (with a resolution on a relatively short timescale -- say 3-6 months) -- that we're still in a "wait and see" status. There is no particular reason to delete it now.Alanf777 (talk) 18:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm wondering now whether to jump back into the editing fray.

Reply via email to