Guys,

We are surrounded by dark matter which absorbs light and energy and matter
 Massive dark matter particles are orbiting through the earth and creating
many/most of our high energy events on Earth including intense weather
patterns, seismic and volcanic activity.

Believe it or not I think they are talking to us through crop circles as
they pass through earth.

Http://darkmattersalot.com

P.S.  Please sidestep all active sinkholes.  Once the low pressure system
moves through they will go dormant.  Then you can fill them in safetly.
 Until then, well, they are just a sinkhole of money, matter and energy.

Stewart

I call this my grand unification theory of hurricanes, tornadoes,
volcanoes, sinkholes and crop circles...

On Saturday, September 22, 2012, Mauro Lacy wrote:

>  On 09/22/2012 08:39 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
> On 09/22/2012 08:29 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
>
> Because the idea of the ether they were after (i.e. were trying to
> confirm) was completely mechanicistic. They never expected light would
> "sink" or "shorten" into the direction of movement. That is, *
> longitudinally*.
>
> Corolarium 1: The Universe is not mechanicistic. Light, at least,
> completely evades a mere mechanicistic representation. If the Universe were
> mechanicistic, it would be a dead, and dark, one.
> Corolarium 2: That "sink" or "shortening" must imply something.
> Conservation of energy, remember?
>
> Now, one hundred years after, give or take a couple of decades: Are we
> ready to really understand this? Or we'll continue to play shell games and
> dumb?
>
>
> In other words: There's more to it than what's usually stated. Modern
> science evades the question by modeling only the visible part of the
> equation, i.e. the material aspect. *There's, without any doubt at all,
> an invisible or spiritual aspect to all of it.* Just don't try to imagine
> it, visualize it, or model it in material terms. But, for God's sake: *don't
> forget about it*. Because you, your very self, is at the stake.
>
>
> 'Are' is probably more appropriate above, not 'is'.
>
> In the very same way as the material world has complex, detailed, and
> strict rules, the spiritual world has them, too. They are different. You
> can spend your whole life just trying to understand some of it. As a first,
> you should just stop pretending they don't exist, i.e. suspension of
> disbelief. And secondly, that they are similar to those of the material
> world.
> Abstraction is another common cause of confusion: abstraction can't never
> be the spiritual, but just, at best, a distilled, or dissected, that is,
> still (i.e. dead) *image* of it.
>

Reply via email to