On 09/22/2012 09:04 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/22/2012 08:39 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
On 09/22/2012 08:29 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Because the idea of the ether they were after (i.e. were trying to confirm) was completely mechanicistic. They never expected light would "sink" or "shorten" into the direction of movement. That is, *longitudinally*.

Corolarium 1: The Universe is not mechanicistic. Light, at least, completely evades a mere mechanicistic representation. If the Universe were mechanicistic, it would be a dead, and dark, one. Corolarium 2: That "sink" or "shortening" must imply something. Conservation of energy, remember?

Now, one hundred years after, give or take a couple of decades: Are we ready to really understand this? Or we'll continue to play shell games and dumb?

In other words: There's more to it than what's usually stated. Modern science evades the question by modeling only the visible part of the equation, i.e. the material aspect. *There's, without any doubt at all, an invisible or spiritual aspect to all of it.* Just don't try to imagine it, visualize it, or model it in material terms. But, for God's sake: *don't forget about it*. Because you, your very self, is at the stake.

'Are' is probably more appropriate above, not 'is'.

In the very same way as the material world has complex, detailed, and strict rules, the spiritual world has them, too. They are different. You can spend your whole life just trying to understand some of it. As a first, you should just stop pretending they don't exist, i.e. suspension of disbelief. And secondly, that they are similar to those of the material world. Abstraction is another common cause of confusion: abstraction can't never be the spiritual, but just, at best, a distilled, or dissected, that is, still (i.e. dead) *image* of it.

Just to clarify, one more thing: the ether is material. It's just a subler, or finer, form of matter. The ether is dark matter. Although transparent matter would be a better term. And yes, it's related to the weather, seismic activity and earthquakes. Probably not to crop circles. At least, not directly :-)

Without the ether, life would not be possible. And without even subtler forms, which gradually lead more and more to the spirit, perception and conscience wouldn't exist either.

All these are things that will, for better and worse, become gradually clear in the centuries to follow. There's nothing that can be done to avoid that. What can and must be done, is to be aware and try to gain a clear understanding of these issues.

Reply via email to