I thought the article was incoherent enough that I'd be afraid to guess what the author really thinks his own point is. Ymmv. Jeff
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is my exegesis of Sterling Allan's presentation of Steven Jones's > recent research: > > 1. There is piezonuclear fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery was > not this. > 2. There is metal-assisted d-d fusion. Fleischmann's and Pons's discovery > was also not this. > 3. There is anamalous xs heat, or "Freedom Energy," which is what > Fleischmann and Pons investigated. They did not discover it. Peter Davey, > in the 1940s, also researched it. People do not know what goes > into anomalous xs heat, but to call it "fusion" > 3a. confuses the issue, because people want to see radiation if there is > fusion. > 3b. is incorrect. > > I couldn't tell whether Jones insisted on (3b) or was just emphasizing > (3a). > > Eric > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jeff Berkowitz <pdx...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title: >> Steven Jones replica: Pons & Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion >> >
