They need to run the power into each wire sequentially at the same level for long enough to see if there is a difference between the two. I suggested a 1 hour run into the inactive, immediately followed by 1 hour of active wire drive, then followed up by 1 hour of inactive again at the 48 watt level. If they do not run this, then it will be very easy to assume calibration problems.
It is so simple to perform this quick check. If we get the extra heating with the active wire and then the temperature returns afterwards there will be good evidence for excess power. The same power input to the cell should result in very similar heating of the outer glass. The main difference will be a large change in the active wire temperature which should significantly effect the power generation mechanism. I expect to see excess power visible between two equal lower power levels as reflected in the outer glass temperature. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Fri, Dec 14, 2012 3:40 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:MFMP: Temperature of inner glass surface. On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/177-write-up-of-eu-cell-baselines >> >> If the higher temperature on the outer surface is not an artifact, >> wouldn't you expect the inner surface temperature to be somewhat >> higher as well? > > > Yup. I am sure it should be higher. > > Sigh . . . > > - Jed > Then again maybe the behaviour is analogous to the sun's corona. The corona sphere is at a higher temperature then the surface of the sun which is the opposite of what you would expect from a straightforward application of thermodynamics. harry
