Basic support to the unemployed won't do it.That doesn't allow for the market of luxuries that gradually improve the standard of living and civilization in general.There are some possibilities in a much shorter working week, much earlier retirement and a direct payment to every individual from the government.The problem is the transition and from where the government would get the money for the change.There are very few ways that fit within the current cultural and political framework in the US.So like the Chinese proverb says:"Interesting times."
Edmund Storms wrote: "This is obviously a basic question and the obvious
answer is a form of socialism. Money will have be extracted from the
system to give basic support to the unemployed and underemployed. As we
know from sad experience, when people are hungary and bored they gum up
the system. This consequence is not hard to predict. The US will be
particularly susceptible to this problem because of the irrational
attitude toward such social support held by people who call themselves
Republicans and libertarians."
- RE: [Vo]:Ano... Mark Goldes
- Re: [Vo]:Ano... Jed Rothwell
- RE: [Vo]:Another arti... MarkI-ZeroPoint
- Re: [Vo]:Another... Eric Walker
- RE: [Vo]:Ano... MarkI-ZeroPoint
- Re: [Vo]:Ano... Eric Walker
- RE: [Vo]:Ano... MarkI-ZeroPoint
- Re: [Vo]:Ano... Eric Walker
- RE: [Vo]:Another article ... OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
- Re: [Vo]:Another arti... Randy Wuller
- Re: [Vo]:Another article about the imp... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:Another article about th... Terry Blanton
- RE: [Vo]:Another article about th... Mark Goldes
- RE: [Vo]:Another article about the imp... a.ashfield
- RE: [Vo]:Another article about th... Mark Goldes