Well, if I had the backing to test the hypothesis, one of the first experiments would be to set up three identical reactors using nickel nanopowder, or Ni loaded zeolite.
1) argon fill, as an inert baseline 2) H2 enriched via multi-stage enrichment of the least dense fractional component of bottled hydrogen. 3) H2 enriched via multi-stage enrichment of the densest fractional component of bottled hydrogen. Would there be a significant difference in the three ? Enquiring minds want to know -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton Jones Beene wrote: > Thus you might say that there would be low mass variability between hydrogen > split from tropical seawater in 1950 and hydrogen spit from Siberian methane > in 2013. That would have profound implications. Some sources of hydrogen would work better than others in a NiH reactor. Remember when we speculated that the Potapov heater efficiency might depend on the water source? Texas water did not work as well as Russian water.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
