First of all, your question was not about my theory. It was about how
I would expected a BEC would behave, which has no relationship to my
theory
Second, I explained to you why I did not answer your question and you
replied with demanding arrogance. In a discussion group, interaction
with other people is voluntary and based on a pleasant and fruitful
interaction.
Third, when I say I do not BELIEVE BEC has a role, perhaps I can
translate this belief into English you can accept. I have seen no
evidence to support the claim. I have seen no plausible justification
that a BEC based on hydrogen atoms can occur at room temperature. I
have seen no evidence or explanation of how a BEC can produce results
that are consistent with observations attributed to LENR. Are these
statements clear? These statements are based on my study and reading
of all the evidence I can find. I'm not interest in debating this
information. I suggest you do this with people who care about a
possible role for BEC.
Fourth, your understanding of how lasers behave when applied to a
solid material conflicts with what I have observed and shows a
confidence on your part that has no justification. If you want an
example of why I want no further discussion with you, simply look at
the way you insist that only you understand this interaction.
On Feb 21, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
OK Kevin, I hurt your feelings. Sorry
***I don't care about hurt feelings. You can hurt my feelings every
day next week and twice on Sunday if you'll answer the simple
question.
You are asking a question that requires a great deal of my time to
fully answer.
***I'm not asking for it to be fully answered. That's why I'm
asking at the 40k foot high Inductive level of Occham's Razor.
If I leave a gap in my answer, other questions follow.
***If you are not going to answer questions as they pertain to your
theory, then what are you doing? Trolling for groupies?
I simply do not have the time to answer all questions.
***You take the time to answer questions you like, and you don't
take the time to answer the questions you don't like. I get it. It
aint very scientific, but I get it.
Besides, I have also made my opinions about the role of BEC clear in
the past, so this idea is not of interest to me.
***If it turns out to be the breakthrough, the idea will be of
interest to you. And if you could find the silver bullet that
destroys BECs as a viable theory, you'd be interested. Since we
have neither of these, we rely on inductive reasoning to move us
forward and now you don't even want to pursue inductive reasoning.
You seem to prefer to engage in opinionation. Now, admittedly,
your opinion is worth more than mine due to your 23 years of effort
in this area. But it just so happens that in the case of laser
cooling (which Dr. Chu got his Nobel Prize for in creating BECs),
you happened to be wrong as it pertained to LENR. So it's in the
best interest of LENR science to close the loop on that line of
inquiry, if only at the 40k foot level.
I do not believe the BEC plays any part in LENR.
***Science aint about belief.
Theoreticians take their ideas very personally and criticism,
either implied or real, is not usually taken kindly.
***It would appear to be the case.
