Kevin, gefore suggesting explanations, a person must know something
about how radiation and LENR behave. Your suggestion is not consistent
with this knowledge. I know it is fun to speculate and I don't want
to insult your interest, but describing the reasons why this
suggestion is not correct would require too much time. I'm afraid you
either need to take my word for this or undertake a study of how
radiation and LENR actually behave. I describe the observed radiation
in my book and the behavior of radiation as it passes through matter
can be obtained from many text books about nuclear physics.
Ed
On Feb 20, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
How about applying Occham's Razor? If these fusion events were
happening on the surface at 10^11 times/sec, then there would likely
-- likely, as in applying INDUCTIVE reasoning-- be far more
radiation emitted because it would not be absorbed by the lattice.
It seems that the absorption by the lattice necessitates a bunch of
lattice to be between the event & the observer. That is consistent
with BECs forming deep inside the lattice, with energetic emissions
colliding with gaps in the lattice near the edges.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Edmund Storms
<stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
To make 1 watt of power using d+d=He, the fusion reaction has to
happen at 10^11 times a second, which would produce radiation at
this flux if it resulted from the process. The detected energetic
radiation is frequently near 1 event/sec. This low level flux can
also be explained by hot fusion being caused as cracks form. Of
course, proof does not exist. The path to an explanation must be
based on rational judgement and good guess at this time. The proof
will come later if money is made available. Money will not come
unless some good guesses are made and applied.
Ed
