it is a surface phenomenon rather than a bulk phenomenon
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Let us take an example…A crack with two faces or two nano-particles > separated by a few nano-meters can separate charge through dipole vibration > with electrons gathering on one side of the crack or nano-particle and > electrons on the other face of the crack or the other nano-particle. > ***Does this mean for your polariton hypothesis to be true that it is a > surface phenomenon rather than a bulk phenomenon? I would think that BECs > are a bulk phenomenon, with the EFFECTs of the nuclear reactions getting > pushed out to the surface like a river washes a landslide & a bunch of > trees to a chokepoint. You notice the backed up river at the chokepoint > but that isn't where the actual phenomenon took place. > > > >> >> > >
