Eric, I agree with what Mark is saying. All you need to do is look at the continual flow of insults from certain members to understand their behavior. I have decided not to further engage at least one of them because of his attitude.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, May 29, 2013 1:25 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat test On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:32 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: You left out the more important part of my posting: “And JC is WELL aware of this, yet asks the question as to why they used 3-phase power in their tests… the second test was SINGLE phase power, so *JC is misleading people*…” We should try not to let this get personal. I've seen no reason to think anyone here is intentionally misleading anyone. People may be playing devil's advocates at times, but that's different. I assume that is how physicsts work. All of this is readily explainable as a culture clash between physicists and engineers. Engineers are reasonable, and physicists are unreasonable and play devil's advocate. That's sufficient explanation for me. We should appreciate the additional prodding we're getting to get our facts straight. I didn't read closely enough to catch on to the single-phase power in the March 2013 test. I assume the same is the case for Joshua. This is the most straightforward explanation. The only question for me is whether the physicist types are getting on everyone's nerves (I have no idea if they're actually physicists; perhaps they are just similarly unreasonable). I'm fine with them being unreasonable, but other people may disagree. Eric
