Morning Vorts, Can I have a little time to look into it?
I do have a life and other responsibilities which consume a lot of time. If indeed both tests used 3ph power INTO the control box, then I have no problem with acknowledging the error! I will reread the report later today. -mark From: Joshua Cude [mailto:joshua.c...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:03 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat test On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: And JC is WELL aware of this, yet asks the question as to why they used 3-phase power in their tests. the second test was SINGLE phase power, so JC is misleading people. but he has a very long history of taking some questionable issue in one test, and making statements that imply that that same issue was present in other tests. I didn't realize they used single phase power for the March 2013 experiment; I had assumed they were using three-phase power. I'm almost certain they were using 3-phase power on the input to the box. They write: "a control circuit having three-phase power input and single-phase output". And it's on the input that the power measurement is made, and so that's where it's relevant. That also forces a particular line to be used, and makes much higher power available, which may have been necessary for the glowing red experiment. I think Mark was mistaken about this, and his failure to acknowledge it suggests he is deliberately trying to mislead people, and he appears to have succeeded in your case.
