For the record: Jed wrote:
"Whether these people are experts or not I'm sure the Association reviewed their work carefully before issuing a statement. I do not think it takes long for an electrical engineer to conclude that there is no possibility of fraud in these tests." You've read their report, Terry, and you are an EE. And you would, based on what you read in the report and what Hartman and Essen said in interviews afterwards, sign a statement to the effect that "there is no possibility of fraud in these tests"??? Why would you do that? We know practically nothing about the input measurement apart from the fact that they used a PCE830 and that Hartman claims he lifted the controller from the table and couldn't see any extra cables. Is that enough for you? ________________________________ Von: Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> An: Yamali Yamali <yamaliyam...@yahoo.de> CC: "vortex-l@eskimo.com" <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Gesendet: 18:46 Freitag, 31.Mai 2013 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:On deception Well, I graduated from Georgia Tech in 1977 with an EE, am a registered professional engineer and manage a group of mostly EE consulting engineers and I agree with Jed. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Yamali Yamali <yamaliyam...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > Jed wrote: "I do not think it takes long for an electrical engineer to > conclude that there is no possibility of fraud in these tests." > > I bet you won't find any EE with any experience in the business who would > sign such a statement.
