ignore and make business. that is what serious guys do.
2013/5/31 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > What kind of credibility problems will the National instrument techs have > after the Ni show demo? What can Ni do to make that test fraud-proof? > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I'd like to throw in as the 4th EE, graduated from University of >> California Santa Barbara 1998. I would sign. But if I were there and had >> the wherewithal, I would have insisted on bringing in our own generator to >> provide the input power. >> >> >> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David L Babcock <ol...@rochester.rr.com >> > wrote: >> >>> I join Terry and Jed on this. EE, 1962. >>> I might hesitate, in view of the subversion of some holy pronouncements >>> of the physics establishment, but sign I would. >>> >>> >>> Ol' Bab >>> >>> >>> >>> On 5/31/2013 12:46 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: >>> >>>> Well, I graduated from Georgia Tech in 1977 with an EE, am a >>>> registered professional engineer and manage a group of mostly EE >>>> consulting engineers and I agree with Jed. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Yamali Yamali <yamaliyam...@yahoo.de> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jed wrote: "I do not think it takes long for an electrical engineer to >>>>> conclude that there is no possibility of fraud in these tests." >>>>> >>>>> I bet you won't find any EE with any experience in the business who >>>>> would >>>>> sign such a statement. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
