Another EE here (plus mechanical undergrad). On balance I think Rossi has something, but I have been disappointed by too many of his slap-dash demos over the last two years to put my reputation on the line in backing him. And there are some potentially big holes in the electrical power delivery (that have been discussed to death here). I can't give him the benefit of the doubt give his dubious history, and It would need a more rigorously instrumented test by people who are more aggressively skeptical than in his tests to date for me to give unequivocal support.
On 31 May 2013 18:51, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to throw in as the 4th EE, graduated from University of > California Santa Barbara 1998. I would sign. But if I were there and had > the wherewithal, I would have insisted on bringing in our own generator to > provide the input power. > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David L Babcock > <ol...@rochester.rr.com>wrote: > >> I join Terry and Jed on this. EE, 1962. >> I might hesitate, in view of the subversion of some holy pronouncements >> of the physics establishment, but sign I would. >> >> >> Ol' Bab >> >> >> >> On 5/31/2013 12:46 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: >> >>> Well, I graduated from Georgia Tech in 1977 with an EE, am a >>> registered professional engineer and manage a group of mostly EE >>> consulting engineers and I agree with Jed. >>> >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Yamali Yamali <yamaliyam...@yahoo.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Jed wrote: "I do not think it takes long for an electrical engineer to >>>> conclude that there is no possibility of fraud in these tests." >>>> >>>> I bet you won't find any EE with any experience in the business who >>>> would >>>> sign such a statement. >>>> >>> >>> >> >
