Josh: If you genuinely want an explanation of how the eCAT is positive feedback, which Dave is trying to do, backed up by his model, then it requires following a line of reasoning. Dave is NOT asking you for an acceptance that Rossi's device does have COP>1; he is only asking that we temporarily accept that condition, and follow the reasoning from there. Why are you afraid to do that? ONCE THE LINE OF REASONING HAS BEEN FOLLOWED TO ITS CONCLUSION, then you are free to assert that you don't agree with the COP>1, but at least we will have been able to drill down on a SINGLE issue and come to a mutual understanding. or, agree to disagree.
-Mark Iverson From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 11:55 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:new hypothesis to confute regarding input energy in Ecat test Why not give a direct answer to a direct question. Do you agree that the COP is greater than 1? Yes or no? Dave
