On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Likewise if the testers concluded that the ecat did not work, the true >> believers will reject the assessment >> because they consider the testers untrustworthy. >> > > There have been several failed tests, such as the one NASA did. I do not > know anyone who claims these tests actually worked and NASA was lying. So I > guess that means I do not know any "true believers." I think that label is > unhelpful. > > Of course the label is unhelpful. So are labels and phrases like "pathological science", "too good to be true" and "extraordinary claims..." BTW is it ok to use the phrase "too evil to be true" as justification to not investigate horrendous crimes? Harry
