John, This is easily disproved. Look at the temperature output graph. How does you notion of constant power instead of a 33% duty cycle explain the dips as rises indicative of a 33% duty cycle in the output corresponding with the measured power on cycles.
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/rossiinout.png Best regards, Jack On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:21 AM, John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com>wrote: > Alan, > > Have you tried your model with what I think is the most likely method of > fraud: running full current through the supposedly "dead" 3rd phase wire? > > This would change the power input from an an average of 266 Watts (800 > Watts * 0.33) to 666 Watts (800 Watts * 0.33 + 400 Watts * 1.0). > > This would produce an apparent COP of 2.5 (avg 666 Watts vs avg 266 > Watts), which is just what the testers reported. > > John > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: About the March test > > > From: "Andrew" <andrew...@att.net> > > Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 3:45:27 PM > > > > > 2. The report shows the device temperature varying synchronously, up > > to a small phase lag, with the pulses. This is expected behaviour. > > The general fluctuation is expected, but the SHAPE of the curve is > consistent only with a TRIANGULAR 150-sec rise, 150-sec fall (or possibly > sawtooth) wave. It is NOT consistent with a DC offset applied either > through the heater or the central reactor cylinder. > > (I have to check what a triangle applied to the heater would look like. I > guess I should also try a 1/450 hz sine wave). > > > >
