If we cannot even agree about what the term LENR means or which
phenomenon it describes, I see no hope in arriving at any common
understanding. Please, can you make an effort to agree on some basic
ideas so that the discussion can move forward? We are dealing with two
different phenomenon. One uses high applied energy from various
sources and the other requires no applied energy. One results in
neutrons when deuterium is used, The other results in helium when
deuterium is used. Can you at least acknowledge that these two
different reactions occur?
Ed
On Jul 7, 2013, at 8:20 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
It seems to me that the reaction mechanism of the experiment
referenced in this thread is electrostatic in nature relating to
high voltage causation of fusion.
To draw a comparison, this is identical to the mechanism used in the
Proton-21 experimental series.
Since Proton-21 is considered a cold fusion or more properly termed
a LENR experiment, so to this referenced experiment should be termed
a LENR experiment.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Edmund Storms
<stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
This paper makes the common mistake of mixing hot- and cold-fusion.
These are two separate and independent phenomenon. They are not
related except both are nuclear reactions involving fusion.
However, the conditions required for initiation and the nuclear
products are entirely different. As long as hot- and cold-fusion are
considered in the same discussion, no progress will be made in
understanding cold fusion.
Ed
On Jul 7, 2013, at 2:31 AM, David ledin wrote:
Interesting paper from nature about successful cold fusion experiment
http://fire.pppl.gov/cyrstal_fusion_nature.pdf
