H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:

They have no *legal* obligation, but it is not unreasonable to say they are
> ethically obligated.
>

I don't see an ethical problem. What harm have they done? They made
themselves look silly, that's all.

If they had used exaggerated claims to defraud investors that would be an
ethical problem. They have not done that as far as I know.

The only unethical thing they have done that I am aware of is not paying
the money they owe me. That's why I suspect they are broke. It isn't much
and they'll probably pay eventually, but you can see why I don't hold them
in high regard. It's tawdry. More bad public relations. Typical of a
start-up business.

- Jed

Reply via email to