On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:39 AM, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The harm is not they don't meet expectations. The harm is that they >>> provide no explanation whenever they fail to meet expectations. >>> Playing with people's emotions is not harmless game. >>> >> >> Personally, I do not mind unguarded statements about what a company is >> going to deliver. If it turns out not to happen, I chalk that up to >> flamboyance, wishful thinking and trying to bring something about, almost >> as if by conjuring it up by saying it. >> >> > > I don't care about commericial claims either, however on two occasions > they have created expectations that independent assessments of their > technology were forthcoming by a certain date. The date passed and no > reports emerged and no explanation was given. Just silence. > > harry > That is not clear. I mean separates dates for each occasion. In June 2011 we were told that the Greek Government would certify their device by august 2011. August 2011 came and went and they said nothing. At the beginning of 2012 they let it be known that their device was being independently assessed by several teams and the results of those tests would be released by may 2012. May 2012 came and went and they said nothing. Harry
