Harry,
Good point and it aligns with dynamic casimir effect and
possibly a form of crack propagation which is normally in a metals but may
apply to the exotic hydrogen states we are discussing. It could also fit into
Mills description of self catalyzing hydrino states and Peng Chens paper about
catalytic action only occurring at openings and defects in nanotubes..if the
already suppressed hydrogen forms an isotropy at one scale and then individual
members then fall into a smaller crack in the geometry does their vacancy break
the isotropy and initiate a crack propagatin as surrounding gas rushes in to
fill the hole.. if this was normal physics we would expect pressure
equalization but suppression of longer vacuum wavelengths is not normal
physics..and more hydrogen in means more hydrogen out but IMHO there is no
spatial bias as the suppression is in a "relativistic direction" and the
exiting hydrogen is pressure driven out equally around the channel of highest
suppression where the hydrogen is entering much like a steam heat system which
uses 1 pipe where steam goes thru the pipe but water condenses and falls back
down the inner walls of the pipe to return to the boiler.
Fran
From: H Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 12:01 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:unknown mechanism generates voltage in the powder
cracks
If this has any bearing on hydrogen loaded metal lattices then the equivalent
of the flour crack might be a region which was formerly filled with hydrogen
but which suddenly became devoid of hydrogen. In other words, instead of cracks
in the lattice being important to excess heat, it might be the opening and
closing of "cracks" in the distribution of hydrogen which contribute to excess
heat.
harry
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Axil Axil
<janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
http://www.scienceinschool.org/2009/issue12/fireballs
I judge this to be important of the LENR scientist as follows:
These patterns proved that the fireballs were indeed full of particles with an
average radius of about 25 nm - i.e. they are nanoparticles. The data also
showed that the particles varied widely in size (very important) (as is typical
of aerosols) and that there were about 109 particles per cubic centimetre. This
makes the volume fraction of solid material (the ratio of volume of solid to
total volume of space) in the fireball around 10-7 or 10-8. There was really
only a very, very, small amount of matter in the cloud. The analysis also
suggested that the particles had quite a rough surface: the scientists found
the surface to have a fractal dimension of 2.6 (2.0 corresponds to a smooth 2D
surface,
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
<blazespinna...@gmail.com<mailto:blazespinna...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Axil, I don't get it. Why not optimize this for power generation? Find a way
to generate cracks in a nano material with a small amount of electricity.
Presumably there is an optimal material, shape, context in terms of gases
present that causes this, and a better method than just 'shifting a Tupperware
container'
This sounds like a revolutionary news article where the main stream press and a
good university (Rutgers) is coming to terms with the reality something is
happening there.
My only question, is that is voltage being reported. What was the excess
thermal heat? Going to email them.
On Saturday, March 8, 2014, Axil Axil
<janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26462348
LENR has been talking about this for some time now.
