Mark, That was a good paper, thanks for posting
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:04 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>wrote: > You might look at this paper as well; I've mentioned it many moons ago. > > > > Polarizable vacuum analysis of electric and magnetic fields, Xing-Hao Ye > > http://arxiv.org/abs/0902.1305v2 > > > > Abstract > > The electric and magnetic fields are investigated on the basis of quantum > vacuum. The analysis of the electromagnetic energy and force indicates that > an electric field is a polarized distribution of the vacuum virtual > dipoles, and that a magnetic field in vacuum is a rearrangement of the > vacuum polarization. It means that an electromagnetic wave is a > successional changing of the vacuum polarization in space. Also, it is > found that the average half length of the virtual dipoles around an > elementary charge is a=2.8 *10^(-15)m. The result leads to the step > distribution of the field energy around an electron, the relation between > the fine structure constant and the vacuum polarization distribution, and > an extremely high energy density of the electromagnetic field. > > > > Finally, > > Anyone who has seen the mag-field-lines in iron filings has to at least > wonder if this is an obvious manifestation of the polarization discussed in > the above paper... 'Fields' are not just convenient mathematical constructs, > but a real physical phenomenon which directly influences matter. The > scientist in me then wonders if the iron filings are following a > polarization of atoms in the air??? But I would bet that you would see the > same thing if done in a vacuum... > > > > -Mark Iverson > > > > *From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Sunday, March 16, 2014 1:02 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia > > > > Yes, when beliefs are challenged, most scientists end up acting more like > religious types. > > > > To explain my idea most simply, it is magnetic hysteresis like drag of > space due to the speed of light limit. > > > > Only it requires acceleration. > > > > Secondly I have found scientific papers claim that the near-field around a > dipole transmits instantaneously within the quarter wave length. > > > > I can find it if anyone is interested. > > > > John > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:51 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> > wrote: > > I don't know if your EM inertia is the same thing, but I mentioned > previously that the concept of inertia being a kind of electromagnetic > 'drag' between accelerated matter and the vacuum of space was first > derived/proposed by Haisch/Rueda many years ago... I've visited Dr. Rueda > several times at his office, Cal State Long Beach, which is where I did my > undergrad work... > > Their first paper on this topic was: > > B. Haisch, A. Rueda and H.E. Puthoff, Phys. Rev A 48 (1994) 678 > > It derived the formula for inertia, F=ma, from the zero-point field; F=ma > was a fundamental equation not thought to be derivable. Comments from the > peer-reviewers went something like this: > > "Well, I can't find any errors in your math, and the physics looks good... > but it just can't be." > > Gee, that sure sounds like a scientist talking... NOT! > > It was Bernie Haisch's concept, but Dr. Rueda did all the math... and take > a look at the 1994 paper and you'll get some idea of just what kind of > mathematician Rueda is... it's like 40+ pages of mostly equations. Anyway, > here's a reference for a followup paper they did in 2005: > > Gravity and the Quantum Vacuum Inertia Hypothesis > > Alfonso Rueda, Bernard Haisch > > (Submitted on 13 Apr 2005 (v1), last revised 15 Apr 2005 (this version, > v3)) > > http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504061v3 > > This caught my eye when scanning the conclusions: > > "(7) An experimental prediction has been made that the mass of the > resonant electromagnetic zero-point field modes within a cavity should add > to the mass of the cavity structure." > > -Mark Iverson > > *From:* fznidar...@aol.com [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com] > *Sent:* Friday, March 14, 2014 7:44 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > > > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Electromagnetic inertia > > I looked at this and came up with the source of electromagnetic inertia is > the acceleration of an energy flow. > > http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter7.html > > >
