Dave--
I read his log about 2x per week. Over the years I have found Rossi to be
sincere and honest.
I suspect he has been in contact with Boeing and the jet engine manufacturers.
I hope it comes to pass with his Hot Cat.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation
Bob, I agree that he could consider doing exactly what you describe and
perhaps one day that will happen. My response was due to what I read on his
blog when he was answering a question from one of his audience. Unless I
misunderstood him, he appeared to use the term jet engine as a replacement for
turbine. Of course a jet engine is often built with turbine compressors, etc.
Do you read his journal? I have found that it contains useful information on
occasions. Recently, the good tidbits of knowledge have been limited as
compared to before his company was purchased this year. I suspect they have
placed a chain around his neck to prevent helping competitors.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 12:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation
Dave--
I assumed Rossi was refering to a LENR reactor that preheated the normal fuel
of a jet engine, similar to what NASA engineers were saying was being considere
by someone and similar to the design of the 1950's GE design of their J-47 jet
engine/nuclear reactor. Depending upon how much energy is added to the fuel,
more or less fuel is required for combustion to get the reaction started and
the engine running. Given enough tubro compression of incoming air, the fuel
usage may decrease to very little or none under normal conditions of operation
and energy release from the LENR reaction.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: David Roberson
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation
I interpret Rossi's discussion of the jet engine as referring to a turbine
generator and not an actual aviation application.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 12:33 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation
From: Axil
DGT is also a validation of Rossi, don't you think?
Possibly, but no one knows. They have presented interesting claims,
especially the magnetic claim - but the scientific data is basically limited to
one joint paper in which Kim says he did not actually validate the data.
Shortly after this IE interview, everything seemed to fall apart for them
financially.
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ManningIE110.pdf
They have no patent, no replications, dwindling support among experts and
no respected scientist to speak for them without Kim – who seems to be less
than enthusiastic these days. They were a no-show at MIT. The web site is
pitiable. Their presence in Canada is reportedly reduced to an answering
machine and shared office with no full time staff. Essentially they seem to be
broke.
Worst of all - the main feature of their reactor – the electrical discharge
into hydrogen loaded powder - is covered in Ahern’s prior patent application.
Their main claim to fame may be having “borrowed” Rossi’s secret recipe, but
the bottom line seems to be lack of funds, probably stemming from a crazy
business plan based on extraordinarily high up-front fees. No one signed up,
apparently.
Don’t hold your breath until they deliver. It’s too bad, since they
probably have seen gain.
Perhaps they can snatch victory for the jaws of defeat. If they can just
demonstrate the incredible magnetic field to a potential investor, that would
seem to be enough. It could have other uses. Note – Rossi has been focusing on
jet engine substitution recently- and the DGT design could be better suited for
that.
