Perhaps there is a reaction of the type you are describing Jones. I cling to the classical ideas about COE and might overlook this system.
My reason for asking about the hydrocarbon was that it is contains a great deal of hydrogen that must be stripped away from the carbon when burned. Once free, I would expect it to behave much like a broken apart hydrogen molecule. Do you understand why free hydrogen taken from a hydrocarbon would be different than the free hydrogen derived from an H2 molecule? Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, Apr 13, 2014 6:40 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent hydrogen From:David Roberson If you take another reaction, such as burning of a liquid hydrocarbon, doesyour technique still demonstrate an unbalance? No- bareprotons must be present for positronium to get involved. We are talking aboutthe need to reach an interface with another spatial dimension – and ifthe proton approaches one dimensionality, it may be possible to disrupt thatother dimension. The main possibilityfor a continuous energy anomaly with nascent hydrogen seems to be a reactorwhere H2 is repeatedly split into protons using a spillover catalyst and then recombining,over and over again, sequentially - but where there is no significant nuclearreaction. Sound familiar? If thereis excess heat with little gamma radiation and little transmutation –there are only a few possible ways to explain the situation. Mills provides onehypothetical way, but I think his explanation is insufficient for the Rossieffect. A reversible diproton reaction is also possible. Conceivably, several relativelyexotic hydrogen reactions could be happening at the same time. This is one ofthem. Thebottom line is that this epo hypothesis is being offered as an alternative for understandingthe results which Rossi’s collaborators will likely report in a fewweeks. Jones
