Or maybe we should give credit where it is due and call it "Positronic Energy", a la Asimov.
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent... David Roberson
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of na... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy o... Steve High
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical ener... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy o... David Roberson
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical ener... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent... Bob Higgins
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of na... Jones Beene
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent... Roarty, Francis X
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent... Bob Higgins
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of na... Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy o... Bob Cook
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical ener... Jones Beene
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chemical ... Jones Beene
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" chem... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" ... Bob Cook
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" ... Jones Beene
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" ... Bob Cook
- RE: [Vo]:The "real" ... Mike Carrell
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical ... Terry Blanton
- Re: [Vo]:The "real" chem... ChemE Stewart