>From many experts in engine I've heard that stirling engine are not a realistic solution... They are popular but don't works well on the field. (hearsay) ***Perhaps that is because there hasn't been much money poured into R&D for stirlings. If LENR were to break out of its skeptopathic prison cell, it would break open the money gates holding back technology such as Stirling Cycle engines.
Only application seems to be small 1kWmech electric production in CHP. this may be very usefull anyway for home CHP. ***Exactly. Stirlings are in the position where they are the most realistic solution when there's a concentrated heat source. All that's missing is the concentrated heat source, and if Rossi gets the nod from NASA and those independent professors, he'll have no trouble with getting the patent. I've heard better about rankine engine (not turbine) and some variation of the stirling where valves are added, the ericsson engine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ericsson_cycle ***Do you know of publicly traded companies that sell these engines? Some expert told me that we should not in fact focus on todays technology as today turbine and engine are small market, and that if thermal engine are produced with the same technology and volume as car engine, it may cost 700$... ***And as far as I can tell, the only publicly traded company focused on developing a thermal engine is CYPW. There was Infinia, but they went bankrupt and the assets were bought by a private Israeli company. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote: > From many experts in engine I've heard that stirling engine are not a > realistic solution... > They are popular but don't works well on the field. (hearsay) > Only application seems to be small 1kWmech electric production in CHP. > this may be very usefull anyway for home CHP. > > I've heard better about rankine engine (not turbine) and some variation of > the stirling where valves are added, the ericsson engine. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ericsson_cycle > > Some expert told me that we should not in fact focus on todays technology > as today turbine and engine are small market, and that if thermal engine > are produced with the same technology and volume as car engine, it may cost > 700$... > > > 2014-05-15 9:35 GMT+02:00 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>: > > Blaze: >> >> If Rossi turned out to be "real", then what do you think would happen to >> Stirling Cycle Engine technology? In particular, a company like CYPW would >> skyrocket, right? >> >> >> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from Nanor but up to >>> 47% based on recent news from Darden in China: >>> >>> http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118 >>> >>> hat tip: >>> >>> >>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/09/tom-darden-involved-in-opening-of-nickel-hydrogen-energy-research-center-in-tianjin-china/ >>> >>> Note: I suspect there will be an up to (-30%, +15%) swing in >>> probability when the june report comes out. Big news indeed. >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Put that back to 43%: >>>>> >>>>> Mr. Darden earned an MRP in environmental planning from the University >>>>> of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,* a JD from Yale Law School* and a >>>>> BA from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he was a >>>>> Morehead Scholar. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom Darden >>>>>> (investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior analyst at >>>>>> Cherokee, BA Economics) who are the players here. >>>>>> >>>>>> It'd be good to find out who those other investors are. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 44% on the basis of Cherokee PR >>>>>>> release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Big big BIG news. Now this is no longer about Rossi, but about >>>>>>> Cherokee. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know you guys think I'm a git for my doubt, but hey, my model is >>>>>>> waaaay ahead of the curve than the vast majority of the investing >>>>>>> universe. >>>>>>> XOM is still trading near historical highs, for example. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news >>>>>>>> coming out of BLP and McKubre. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The next >>>>>>>> indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection report. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo Corporation MIAMI - >>>>>>>>> FL - USA previous job was: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> " Frelance >>>>>>>>> Consultant<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&title=Frelance+Consultant&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true¤tTitle=CP&trk=prof-exp-title> >>>>>>>>> European >>>>>>>>> Gaming and Gambling Tech >>>>>>>>> Market<http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name> >>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -4% >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now back to 31%. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is based on >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>>>>>>>>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>>>>>>>>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>>>>>>>>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. Could >>>>>>>>>> be updating this probability more frequently. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
