Then are we now adding the condition that the temperature needs to be above 800C in order to determine that "Rossi is real"???
We seem to be off the track of that subject. We've been talking about what is the optimum engine technically to work with a LENR device. My question is aimed at SWWAT-- Starting With What's Available Today. And my question hasn't really been answered -- If Rossi is determined to be "real", wouldn't a stock like CYPW take off? Are there other public stocks that would skyrocket? Any "steam engine" stocks? It seems generically obvious to me that CYPW would take off. I don't know of any other publicly traded stocks that would skyrocket as a result of "Rossi being real". This brings me obliquely to a point I made earlier about Blaze Spinnaker. I didn't think he was being straightforward when he first brought this probability thing up. And I don't think he's straightforward now. Here's how: Let's say we wake up tomorrow and read in the news that "Rossi is real". The independent third party report verifies that he has a rainbow directly proceeding from his hind quarters and there's a pot of gold there (but no leprachaun to explain it all). And NASA says they have been evaluating this device and are ready to purchase more than 100 units for testing. And IH says they are ready to schedule a demo to the patent office so that they can proceed with the patent as the PTO has outlined, by demonstrating the technology. All the vectors point towards "It's real". The world is suddenly turned on its head. Immediately we would see a huge capital shift into every corner of this technology -- hundreds of $billions. A stock like CYPW would be targeted by Toyota or any number of multi$Billion enterprise companies. So that means that, if someone posts that they think it's a 35% chance that "Rossi is real" but don't think it's worthwhile to invest accordingly, he's not being straightforward. If someone were to tell you that there's a 1/3 chance that within a quarter, you could make 5X return on an investment, it would be worth putting a thousand dollars down, wouldn't it? Actually, when you see what kind of jumps penny stocks take, and that CYPW has jumped by more than that in 2007 (more than 100X), it increases those pot odds substantially. And the downside is that it's an unhealthy company like CYPW, who could go bankrupt (like Infinia did) within a year. It's quite similar to the way poker is played. If you're trying to fill an inside straight (11:1 odds to fill) and the pot odds are $20:1 (costs $1 to win $20), then the smart move is to stay in because the pot odds are higher than the winning odds. If it costs $4 to stay in, the pot odds go to $5:1, and you stay out. With stock, if your emotional odds are 1/3 of winning, and the pot odds are $1:10, where $1 wins you $10, then you buy because the emotional odds are lower than the pot odds. On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com>wrote: > > From many experts in engine I've heard that stirling engine are not a >> realistic solution... >> > > If the temperature of a device approaches 8-900 C, as seen in the Elforsk > test, a simple steam engine should be adequate. > > Eric > >
