Can you really understand why the calorimetry is wrong? Can you really see that the paper posted by DE is full of anecdotal evidences? Can you see that what they claim in AR vs. H2 is contradicted by the DEMO? Even if the DEMO was using wrong calorimetry, it was not in the way it was explained in the article. Calorimetry may be inaccurate, but in what way, no one explained?
2014-05-21 2:19 GMT-03:00 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>: > More obfuscation. Not answering the question. Basically bullshit. The > answer is YES. The calorimetry was wrong. If "Facts are so more > important than Words" then why is he supplying bullshit words where facts > are called for? Because the jig is up. Jed is right. > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
