Can you really understand kindergarten level gamesmanship? Can you really see that the paper NEVER posted by Defkalion wouldn't have provided the kind of evidence we all needed anyways? Can you see that what is claimed in Obscurity vs. Larceny is contradicted by the fact that one of them submitted to 2 independent 3rd party tests and the other didn't? Even if the submission DEMO was using wrong (what, Laser Temperature Readers that everyone uses in industry???) thermometers it was not in the way it was explained in this article nor in your latest charades? Calorimetry may be accurate, but what kind of professor needs to be accurate within a 10th of a degree when the observed effect is hundreds of degrees past what any chemical reaction could produce?
Lately you and Axil have gone off the edge. It was probably Ed Storms who was keeping you properly leashed. On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > Can you really understand why the calorimetry is wrong? Can you really see > that the paper posted by DE is full of anecdotal evidences? Can you see > that what they claim in AR vs. H2 is contradicted by the DEMO? Even if the > DEMO was using wrong calorimetry, it was not in the way it was explained in > the article. Calorimetry may be inaccurate, but in what way, no one > explained? > > > 2014-05-21 2:19 GMT-03:00 Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>: > > More obfuscation. Not answering the question. Basically bullshit. The >> answer is YES. The calorimetry was wrong. If "Facts are so more >> important than Words" then why is he supplying bullshit words where facts >> are called for? Because the jig is up. Jed is right. >> >> > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
