Reiterating: In the NIH reactor, all the Nuclear active sites(NAE) are entangled. The are many of them: millions, maybe billions.
These entangles sites form a super atom where each site shares a fraction of each reaction's energy based on the number of NAEs. The fraction of energy sharing goes as the square root of the numbers of entangled NAEs. When a BEC is not formed and their is no super atom to thermalize the gammas(when the system is cold), gammas appear as shown in the experiments of Piantelli. http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2004/2004Focardi-EvidenceOfElectromagneticRadiation.pdf *Evidence of electromagnetic radiation from Ni-H Systems* also see http://shutdownrossi.com/e-cat-science/110-quotes-by-rossi-about-gamma-rays-and-transmutations/ On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:32 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > Jones, > > I would expect the energy transfer to be in both directions. The big > question we are seeking an answer to is whether or not the energy > difference steps are much smaller than the full amount released by the > reaction. I think Bob is hoping that energy can be taken away in smaller > chunks and that is what I would want to see as well. > > Has anyone identified exactly where the large MeV energy from a D x D > fusion is stored? It remains in place for a short duration until > released. Perhaps it can be taken in many portions instead of one > dangerous gamma. Should we be looking at the behavior of isomers for > guidance since they are capable of long term storage of large amounts of > nuclear energy? > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Thu, Jul 10, 2014 10:10 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dynamic nuclear polarization > > From: Bob Cook > > I think it seems reasonable that nature likes small energy > transitions at cool temperatures as opposed to large ones associated with > high temperature/kinetic energy reactions. It is pretty clear that the > known reactions of spin transfer occur in small quantum increments. The DNP > phenomena are good examples. > > Aren’t you completely misinterpreting what this article states in trying to > shoehorn it in LENR? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_nuclear_polarisation > > First, It says nothing about transfer of spin energy from nucleus to > electrons – only transfer from electrons to nucleus. Huge difference. > > Secondly, this transfer results in lower temperature of electrons – not > higher. > > I see no conceivably way this can be used to justify slow energy release > from an excited nucleus. > > Jones > >
