Jones,
I would expect the energy transfer to be in both directions. The big question
we are seeking an answer to is whether or not the energy difference steps are
much smaller than the full amount released by the reaction. I think Bob is
hoping that energy can be taken away in smaller chunks and that is what I would
want to see as well.
Has anyone identified exactly where the large MeV energy from a D x D fusion is
stored? It remains in place for a short duration until released. Perhaps it
can be taken in many portions instead of one dangerous gamma. Should we be
looking at the behavior of isomers for guidance since they are capable of long
term storage of large amounts of nuclear energy?
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Jul 10, 2014 10:10 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dynamic nuclear polarization
From: Bob Cook
I think it seems reasonable that nature likes small energy
transitions at cool temperatures as opposed to large ones associated with
high temperature/kinetic energy reactions. It is pretty clear that the
known reactions of spin transfer occur in small quantum increments. The DNP
phenomena are good examples.
Aren’t you completely misinterpreting what this article states in trying to
shoehorn it in LENR?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_nuclear_polarisation
First, It says nothing about transfer of spin energy from nucleus to
electrons – only transfer from electrons to nucleus. Huge difference.
Secondly, this transfer results in lower temperature of electrons – not
higher.
I see no conceivably way this can be used to justify slow energy release
from an excited nucleus.
Jones
