*Regarding the report, the first problem was that it measured with neutral Ar and then with H2 and both yield the same high power measure. In the demo, they had different power measures, the one with Ar, was low*
*This is a good point.* *In the demo that I watched, I saw the neutral Ar test produce no excess heat. The fact that excess heat was seen in the Italian test implies that the testers did not understand what they were doing. This is understandable because they were going it alone for the first time without the help of DGT’s experience.* *Even DGT admits to mistakes made in the demo that they designed. This is a sure sign of honesty in admitting a learning curve not yet completed.* *The NiH reactor will be extremely challenging to test and will require much trial and error in testing to get it right. Why assume fraud or stupidity in preference to a steep and difficult learning curve in coping with a difficult situation.* *Why should we believe the Italian testers when they contradict the evidence produced through the use of our own eyes by more experienced testers?* *This apparent ineptness in testing places every conclusion drawn from the testers during the Italian test in question.* On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Note, it's been almost a month an no one answere. There is no need to DGT > clarify anything since Gambarelli did a piss poor report. They should > clarify that first. > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
