You can't be referring to the test I saw on the internet. To advance my understanding and my memory, that test is still available for reference. Can you point to where this problem is seen on the video? I don't remember such a problem showing up.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This sounds like there was something wrong with the equipment and/of the >> test setup. >> > > Correct. > > > >> Fix the equipment and/or test setup and rerun the test. >> > > Yes, they should have done that, but they never did. As far as anyone > knows, they never fixed the problem or reran the test. Or if they did, they > have kept the results secret. > > > >> Running a test with this anomaly ongoing puts the test result in >> question. Since DGT did not rum the test, they cannot be blamed for the >> malfunction. >> > > DGT did run this test! They did it during the ICCF conference. > > DGT has never shown any other test, or published data from any other test. > Many people visited them over the years. They claimed that these people > wrote positive reports. They repeatedly claimed they were going to publish > the reports, but they never did. All the people I know who visited them > said the device did not work. > > > >> Am I missing something? >> > > Apparently you need to read the Gamberale report and the comments by the > DGT president where he admitted the report is correct. > > - Jed > >
