This sounds like there was something wrong with the equipment and/of the test setup. Fix the equipment and/or test setup and rerun the test.
Running a test with this anomaly ongoing puts the test result in question. Since DGT did not rum the test, they cannot be blamed for the malfunction. Am I missing something? On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Additional information was provided, that Defkalion had seen >> disruption of electronic equipment by the device, such as their phone >> system being shut down; the measurements reported were with all >> shielding removed; normally, they operate the Hyperion with mu-metal >> and other shielding, to cut down on EMF interference. It is not >> surprising that there could be massive noise, they are stimulating >> the reaction through a high voltage applied to those spark plugs used >> as convenient feed-thrus at either end of the device. >> > > Let me just say this one last time. This analysis is divorced from > reality. This sort of thing cannot be the cause of the problems reported by > Gamberale because these problems occurred when the THE REACTOR WAS TURNED > OFF and WHEN THERE WAS NO WATER FLOWING THROUGH THE FLOW CALORIMETER. > > So EMF noise and all other factors are irrelevant. The calorimetry did not > work. All of the results were meaningless. The president of Defkalion > admitted as much. There is nothing to discuss here. If Defkalion publishes > another set of tests with proof that the calorimetry worked, then we will > have something to discuss. Defkalion has never published anything. Not one > table, not one data set. Nothing. I do not expect they will every publish > anything. > > - Jed > >
