Could it be that the active regions are tiny hole like structures instead of 
wide cracks?  CNTs are much more uniform in size than random cracks upon the 
metal surfaces and I must wonder if a uniform sized structure would encourage 
common coupling enhancement.

One reason that I mention CNTs is that iron is seldom found without carbon 
contamination and it would seem that native nickel likely has the same issue.  
The different grades of steel are obtained by controlling the percent of carbon 
contained within and by careful heat treating to achieve the desired grain 
structure.

I read somewhere that all of the iron used today along with the nickel was 
originated in meteorites from long ago and that if true would imply that carbon 
is always included in the metal mix.   This raises the possibility that the 
secret ingredient might be carbon and how it is distributed throughout the 
metal.  It doesn't take too much imagination to  picture tiny sections of 
carbon tubes or balls capturing the hydrogen and becoming the centers of LENR 
activity.  If true, no wonder that it is extremely difficult to construct the 
metal surface into the desired form.

This concept may have already been discussed on the board, but it might have 
merit.  I just want to throw the concept into the mix to open additional areas 
of inquiry.  Of course this idea is in relation to Rossi type reactors that use 
nickel as the main metallic ingredient.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 4:40 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Review of Ed Storms book: "The Explanation of Low Energy 
Nuclear Reaction"


The key to LENR is squeezed electrons. 1 dimensional structures will squeeze 
electrons. Putting electrons into a nano-box is the first step in the LENR 
process.



On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:06 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:

Why call a crack one dimensional when it has a width associated with it?  A 
hole is more one dimensional.


Dave

 

 




Now, cracks actually can be studied, are they predominantly monodimensional as 
it is probably desired- chennels or bidimensional, can cracking be controlled? 
It has much to do with metallurgy. Some experiments could be done with 
nanotubes- probably if the material of the walls is not relevant.
If Ed is right, I will gladly apologize in any case. As I have shown inthe VUCA 
paper, we need ceratainties.
Peter
 






Reply via email to