Are you saying calorimeter measurements can measure sunlilght, UV and soft X-Rays? I didn't think that was the case.
Again, according to "the doctor" that's where most of the energy resides. Just repeating what I heard. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com zazzle.com/orionworks From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 9:18 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Is the SunCell a titanium burner? The speculation (of inaccurate calorimetry) is nonsense. Visible photons passing through the water are captured on the wall of the calorimeter - all of the heat is retained and captured in the water. You guys seem to want to boost Mills by claiming he cannot measure his own gain because he is an idiot with calorimetry, and the gain is actually higher? LOL what kind of logic is that? Sorry, and there could eventually be higher gain than this from photocells, but the only real proof here is COP of about 2. No mystery why the photocell data is still not released. And you can see that titanium is far and away the best catalyst – which is what started this thread to begin with. Everything else is hype – designed to elicit funding from the carefully selected audience. OTOH – it is still COP ~2. And that is worth something From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson I basically concur with Axil's speculations.
