After the arc discharge, the TiC2 will be completely vaporized. But in microseconds, titanium nanoparticles will condense out of the plasma when the plasma temperature falls below the boiling point of titanium.
There will be a timeframe when titanium will be a solid and chlorine will be a gas at a temperature above 1500C. It will be in this timeframe in which the LENR reaction will take place. I predict that the light emissions from the reaction will be offset in time after the completion of the arc discharge by the number of microseconds it takes titanium to condense out of the plasma. The emission of light will persist for as long as chlorine remains a gas. I also predict that a continuous emission of light will be produced if the Sun cell is operated at a temperature over 1500C but no more than 3500C when pumped by an electric current. This is a form of LENR based titanium vapor lamp. On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > LENR will always occur in a nanoparticle environment when pumped by an > electric discharge. This is witnessed by many experiments involving > exploding foils comprised of various types of metals. > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> First, the fact that the same output could be obtained with a 5J input is >> completely undocumented - it is just thrown out there and without presented >> demonstration or experimental data - the comment is worthless. >> >> Their calorimetry appears to be flawed. They have apparently modified >> the calorimeter to bring in huge current carrying conductors, and everyone >> knows that what carries current well also transports heat well. The heat >> carried by these conductors needed to be calibrated out of the reaction, >> but this was done in a way that did not account for the heat contained in >> the ejecta of the actual experiment. The result is an overestimation of >> the heat carried out by the conductors and subsequently an overestimation >> of the COP. >> >> I am not saying that his COP is less than 1. I think he may be realizing >> excess heat. I just don't believe his claim for high COP at all. And with >> low COP, you will not be able to convert to electricity with net gain. I >> think he has an advantage in that he has high enthalpy of his output, but >> the COP is low. The prospect of converting MW of light (even if the >> efficiency made sense) is pretty ridiculous. I built a 5.4 kW array for >> solar electric and it had 67 square meters of collection area. Do you >> really think he will be able to collect even 5 kW in a single square meter? >> 100kW would melt the PV cells due to inefficiency. It is about as >> [im]practical as his completely flawed plan to use MHD conversion. >> >> Note also the work of Santilli with similar high current experiments. >> His work was subsequently reproduced by Kadeisvili. Santilli showed that >> in high current discharge, LENR transmutation occurred at a reasonably high >> rate. The transmutation evidence was strong, indicating LENR was occurring >> in this high current discharge. Mills may actually get excess heat, but >> much of it may be coming from LENR. Mills does not want this to be the >> case, because heat produced via LENR would not be covered by his patents. >> So he doesn't look for the transmutation products in his result, or he >> doesn't publish that data. Mills may be correct about the fractional >> quantum states of hydrogen and they may be complicit in LENR. But he would >> lose a lot of his patent value if the heat were proved to actually be >> coming from LENR. >> >> Bob Higgins >> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> If I remember correctly, it is about 2/3 to 3/4 of the way on video >>> 1. A guy named Jim??? did the bomb calorimetry and he showed the output >>> graph of the temp rise which he calculated to be around 623+ J. Randy then >>> explain that the input power was around 200+ J because the fuel was >>> enclosed in an aluminum sphere shell so it takes energy to vaporize the >>> aluminum sphere shell also. He then explained that if the fuel is >>> detonated directly, that the input energy is 5J instead of 200+ J. They >>> then explained that in this particular single explosion, the COP was 4+. >>> >>> >
