NiH2 >Zn*> Ni + He 2H(1) + Ni(64) > Zn(66)* Step1 Zn(66)* > Ni(62) + He(4) Step 2
You also suffer from the nuclear physics syndrome where reactions are fixed over all systems. Each LENR system has a unique transmutation character based on the way the magnetic field emitters are deployed. In fact, each nickel particle produces a different reaction. On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Robert Lynn <robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com > wrote: > so the claim is essentially that this soup of elements were also consumed > to exhaustion, without changing power input or output as their quantities > reduced, in an amazingly perfect process that has as its only product the > highest binding energy Ni62 (also consuming Ni64) and without creating any > observable radiation during the process and no radiative ash. > > It will require a very high level of proof to convince the world of the > truth of that. > > On 9 October 2014 11:15, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You have some unfounded assumptions in your thinking that are the same >> assumption that the testers suffer from. >> >> The reaction does not center on the nickel or the lithium. The LENR >> transmutation is done in the hydrogen and the aluminum and other elements. >> >> Did you see this line on page 53? >> >> Sample 2 was the fuel used to charge the E-Cat. It’s in the form of a >> very fine powder. Besides the analyzed elements it has been found that the >> fuel also contains rather high concentrations of C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn and >> these are not found in the ash. >> >> This means that C, Ca, Cl, Fe, Mg, Mn were consumed in the LENR reaction. >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Robert Lynn < >> robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> De-cloaking long term lurker. >>> Latest test result issues that raise my suspicions: >>> >>> - The uniformity of the Ni ash concerns me, the burn mechanism >>> somehow converts all natural Ni isotopes (smaller and larger!! so fusion >>> and fission in evidence) to Ni62, but with miraculously no radioactive >>> isotopes produced? >>> - The test is stopped at a pre-determined time where all the Ni just >>> happens to have been converted, and nearly all the Li7, Rossi must have >>> done exhaustive development to judge it so perfectly. >>> - Huge consumption of Li, Ni 'fuel' - almost to exhaustion, yet the >>> reaction power and COP appears to not change significantly through the >>> test. To me that is exceptionally strange (practically magical) >>> behaviour. >>> >>> If I were setting up a fake there are simple means to get power into the >>> unit invisibly- like IR or UV lasers, fiber lasers, x-ray tubes, focused >>> microwaves etc but I don't have enough info about the setup and facilities >>> to make any judgement on things like this. I'm happy with black box >>> reactor approach, and optical thermography/calorimetry is OK for these >>> COPs, but flow calorimetry would be better. Unless and until truly >>> independent testers have full control over the environment and calorimetry >>> in facilities not controlled by Rossi these tests will not convince the >>> world. >>> >>> I'll continue to observe, and hold some hope, but given the track record >>> of sub-par demos and rumours of unpublished negative results I will need >>> independent external testing by other than old associates of Rossi. >>> >>> On 9 October 2014 10:26, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Jed, perhaps someone is trying to discredit Rossi and thought this was >>>> the best way to do so. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If Rossi switched out the ash, he's a fraud. End of story. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here is something you think about. Why would he switch out the ash? >>>>> What possible benefit would that bring to him? What motivation would he >>>>> have? The answers are no reason, none and none. Reasons: >>>>> >>>>> 1. The people paying for this work do not care about what causes the >>>>> effect. They are interested in excess heat. Whether it comes from Ni >>>>> transmutation or zero-point-energy is beside the point. It will not be >>>>> more >>>>> convincing to them if Rossi puts unnatural Ni isotopes into the mix. On >>>>> the >>>>> contrary, that will only confuse the issue and delay the research. >>>>> >>>>> 2. Suppose he did it. He is bound to be caught sooner or later. If >>>>> this technology ever goes anywhere it will be independently replicated by >>>>> people Rossi never meets, in labs he never goes to. It is certain they >>>>> will >>>>> find out he is faking. Long term, he will fail. So what short term gain >>>>> can >>>>> there be? >>>>> >>>>> 3. Along the same lines, if it is not true, he cannot get a patent for >>>>> it, or a Nobel, or anything else. >>>>> >>>>> 4. Since people would soon distrust him, this would get in the way of >>>>> proving the excess heat is real, and setting up commercial ventures. The >>>>> excess heat is the only thing with commercial value at this stage, and >>>>> Rossi is only interested in commercial development. He does not give a fig >>>>> about science. >>>>> >>>>> Levi and Rossi's backers also have zero motivation to fake the Ni >>>>> results. It would not benefit them at all, for the same set of reasons. >>>>> >>>>> Can you suggest any reason he *would* want to do this? Since this is >>>>> your hypothesis, it is up to you to give a plausible reason why it might >>>>> be >>>>> true. >>>>> >>>>> - Jed >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
