Jed,

Whether you realize it or not - you are sounding hugely hypocritical –
especially based on the way you slimed DGT with far less evidence of
misconduct, based on Kim’s report 

… and yet now, with almost overwhelming evidence that this report is bogus,
contrived, and not independent in any remote way - you are grasping at
straws to keep it from suffering the fate it rightly deserves.

Get real. Rossi is playing you like a harp.


                From: Jed Rothwell 

                Jones Beene wrote:
                 
                Andrea Rossi who gradually brought it to the power level
requested by us.
                Rossi later intervened to switch off the dummy, and in the
following
                subsequent operations on the E-Cat.” (from page 6 of the
original, before
                being edited out)
                
                It has not been edited out.
                 
                 
                Hmmm… Rossi Intervened in the calibration way back at the
start of the
                testing ?
                
                He turned it off. He has no magic powers to put false
numbers into meters. He then showed them how to turn on the cell --
gradually.
                
                 
                So he was directing everything both at the start, during
                calibration and at the end, during isotope removal - it
would seem… so much
                for an independent report.
                
                He was not there for 32 days. How do you propose he managed
to "compromise" the test during that time? By ESP?
                
                - Jed
                

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to