Hello ,
On 27-Jul-99, you wrote:
>> That should be good for a ROTFL. Is it the 14 year old one or the 15
>> year old?
>>
>> Yes, I've talked to them too (and seen them).
>
> I'm rather disappointed that your argument is to ridicule what age
> someone might be. I've run into a lot of Amiga "kids" that have been
> more "on the ball" (Boing!-ball, that is) than many of their adult
> contemporaries.
Well, you're right about that. It's unfair to judge them by their age.
But these two boys don't have a problem in slagging off Voyager. For
example in an AF interview they said they were tired of having Voyager
crash the n-th time, and therefore wanted to bring a "proper" browser to
the Amiga market. V 2.95 virtually never crashed my system (GFX card),
maybe once in a month, whereas Netscape on my PC crashes quite
regularily. V� is worse than Netscape, but it's a prerelease, so there
is still hope! Then on their "redesigned" webpage, they apologised for
not meeting their deadlines, but in the same sentence said, it's worth
the wait when you look at the newly released V�. They are making quite
some statements, at least Voyager does what it is intended to do, and I
hope they will be judged by their words. i.e. when their Netscape port
crashes less often than VNG (to which they were referring) I will
consider their statements to be more than hot air. Until then I wait for
their first official alpha whatever release in the "first week of june".
Regards
--
Oliver Esberger - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
