>>> What's wrong with AGA? It seems Ok to me. But hey, I'm no techie.
>>
>> Yes it works but it's slow and supports only 256 colors. Some
>> pictures on the web uses more colors so that's why it's nice
>> with a gfx-card. Even if AGA supports 256.000 colors WB doesn't
>> support HAM8 so...
>
> You don't have to run Voyager on a WB screen, though, do you?
> Does Voyager support HAM screens?
I don't care what screen you runs it on, it will only be 256 colours anyway.
It's a maximum with a new aga-screen selected in MUI too. What's your
point?
> Anyway, if they expected everyone to run in 32bit truecolour
> in ultra high resolutions, they wouldn't have invented dithering
> or antialiasing, would they?
I'm only running in 16bit highcolour and it still looks nicer then 256
colours. And most important, like I said before, it's faster, MUCH faster.
I havn't said that everyone should run 32bit truecolour in ultra high
resolutions so why do you write all this crap for??
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
