> > Linux sucks. BSD doesn't. > > Hmm.. Will have to see if I can find a cd... And something to install > it on :)
FreeBSD 4.7 just got released. Download the ISO (or two.. since the live filesystem on disc two is useful :) If you have to insist on using an Amiga-able BSD, NetBSD should be just fine, but running it on something that slow really isn't useful. People run around shouting about how they have their 486 Linux box at home and it does this and that.. jesus.. it's slow as hell and totally unuseful. Any system that is too slow to do SSH in "real time" can't be very good in my book. I like characters to hit the terminal when I type them, not 5 seconds later ;) > > overclocked in a previous life and that guy obviously broke it) > > Holy.. Your Amiga stuff has been through nine rounds with a really > mean boxer. It got used, definitely. More than most. Had it for nigh on 6 years now, and now it's dead.. well.. fuck it ;) I'm getting a laptop and another peice of hardware which will more than provide for it's "services". > > HyperCOM3 (parallel port not suitable for ECP modes, need a mod) > > I have one of those in my pile of A4000 parts... Want another? :P > Oh! A lot of SAS stuff. Not really, it's mostly gcc stuff, but it doesn't compile on non-Amiga systems (since it references Amiga components etc.). There is a version of Voyager that compiles on Linux (**NOT FOR** Linux) but.. it's a completely different kettle of fish. > date... With an 040/25, it would take what, days to cross-compile the > PPC version? :-P A couple of hours, for large values of couple, I'd say about 18-20. The bottleneck is disk speed even on a PPC. ixemul doesn't help. -- Matt Sealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
