> FreeBSD 4.7 just got released. Download the ISO (or two.. since the
> live filesystem on disc two is useful :)

Hmm.. let me guess.. www.freebsd.org? 

> If you have to insist on using an Amiga-able BSD, NetBSD should be
> just fine, but running it on something that slow really isn't useful.

Let's see, uhm.. No.  I cannot see any OS other than the AmigaOS being
able to run swiftly on the Amiga hardware.  I remember the Quadras,
even a 486 is zippy in comparison.

> People run around shouting about how they have their 486 Linux box
<snip>
> time" can't be very good in my book. I like characters to hit the
> terminal when I type them, not 5 seconds later ;)

Yeah, no doubt.  If I were to attempt running linux on a 486, it would
be a shell only.  

> > mean boxer.
> 
> It got used, definitely. More than most. Had it for nigh on 6 years
> now, and now it's dead.. well.. fuck it ;)

There are times when you just have to light a candle, throw a black
cloth over something, and write it's obituary.  Sometimes, something
is just *dead*.

> I'm getting a laptop and another peice of hardware which will more
> than provide for it's "services".

Hey do what you have to!  I know it sounds insane, but maybe you guys
could get a couple of "developer" systems from those wanting thier
hw/os combos to have better software :-P  Yup, and the world is flat;
because you know that it makes too much sense.

> > > HyperCOM3 (parallel port not suitable for ECP modes, need a mod)
> > 
> > I have one of those in my pile of A4000 parts... 
> 
> Want another? :P

Heh, no thanks.  We could post them on Ebay as collectors' items :-)

  
> > Oh!  A lot of SAS stuff.
> 
> Not really, it's mostly gcc stuff, but it doesn't compile on non-Amiga
> systems (since it references Amiga components etc.). There is a version
> of Voyager that compiles on Linux (**NOT FOR** Linux) but.. it's a
> completely different kettle of fish.

Well, I'm willing to try to help, if you guys would like.  Though,
you'll have to keep in mind that I know very little on the subject.  I
just happen to have a spare Amiga with SAS and Storm4 on it.  I can
promise, however, that you'll probably be cussing my ineptatude before
it was over 8-)

> > date...  With an 040/25, it would take what, days to cross-compile the
> > PPC version? :-P 
> 
> A couple of hours, for large values of couple, I'd say about 18-20. The
> bottleneck is disk speed even on a PPC. ixemul doesn't help.

Brr.  That's a while.  I can see why a seperate system for compiles
like that are necissary.

-- 
--
Regards,

Dave 'Targhan' Crawford

Reply via email to