Jan Hlavatý wrote:
Alexander Gavrilov wrote:
Yes, SQLite 3 is available as DBD::SQLite. But I didn't see any
noticeable
differences in performance: switching the DB to a ramdisk is a lot
more effective.
So the only argument for switching is that SQLite2 is sort of
obsolete. On the
downside, it may bring hidden bugs, like the one in that hunk which
adds '+0' to
a request to make it work.
SQLite2 module fails the module test suite (crashes during test) on
win32 for me
and wont install, anything is better than that.
Why are you building it on Windows? You should be able to just install
the module from the ActiveState repository using ppm.
toby
_______________________________________________
vss2svn-users mailing list
Project homepage:
http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin:
http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org
Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives):
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
