On 9/23/08, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One idea: How about using just one repository, but shaped like this: > > trunk/ > branches/ > tags/ > > then a next level (example from inside trunk): > > trunk/code/ > trunk/data/ > trunk/originals/ > > so if you wanted to download the latest of all, you would do svn up on > trunk, while if you wanted to just grab a new code branch, you'd do > svn up on trunk/code only. > > I do not see what you gain from using separate repositories, instead > of separate directories inside a single repository. Am I missing > something? I think it is a feature that with a single repository we > would still have one global revision ID for everything, so you could > say, "test revision NNN", instead of "test code revision NNN with data > revision MMM".
What you suggest would be fine. I just wasn't sure if it is better (or allowed) to have one big repository or not. If we do have a size limit, it is better to find out from GNA now, rather than running into this later.
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
